 |
Friday,
July 25, 2008
"For behold, the
darkness shall cover the earth, and deep darkness the people; but the
Lord will arise over you, and His glory will be seen upon you." Isaiah
60:2 NKJV
- A
Message from Bishop David Anderson
Anglican communion a 'train wreck', says bishop
US
Bishops drop bid to have Robinson admitted to Lambeth Conference
Lambeth rocked as Primate of Sudan calls on Robinson to resign
Bishop
Iker calls for Robinson backers to withdraw from Lambeth
Common
Cause Partnership Welcomes Jerusalem Declaration
Response of the GAFCON Theological Resource Team to the St Andrews
Draft
________________________
A Message from Bishop David Anderson
Dearly Beloved in Christ,
At the AAC, we learned long ago that since the media can help or hurt
you, treat them humanely, the way you would wish to be treated. When an
event occurs, certainly those present take away their own impressions,
but for the vast majority who will only read about it or see it on the
TV, the media interprets the event. Why would anyone go out of their way
to make life miserable for the media? Although GAFCON in Jerusalem
wasn't perfect from a media standpoint, there was a sincere attempt to
get the media what they needed: access inside during plenary sessions,
interviews with bishops, press conferences, etc. In retrospect, could it
have been done better? Absolutely, but there was a genuine attempt to do
the right thing for the media.
Contrasted with that philosophy is the view that the media is your enemy
and you must a) keep them out, b) choose between good and bad media for
access, and c) have everyone so disciplined that their talking points
are recited no matter what the question. One has to pity the media,
seeing how they are being treated at Lambeth, but then again, it doesn't
sound like the bishops themselves are being all that well taken care of,
either. The secrecy thing is either hilarious or pathetic: is not
everyone there under godly authority? Are some there in defiance of
their House of Bishops or their Primate? Are they making a "prophetic
statement" by being there anyway? Yet their "prophetic statement" must
be kept secret.
Since we know that the Church of England still claims that they have a
membership of 25 million souls, and attendance records indicate that in
fact they only have 1.6 million, their accuracy with mathematics doesn't
seem stellar. Their membership disparity is the spiritual or ecclesial
equivalent to the sub-prime loan crisis affecting so many in the USA
housing market. Book value of loans doesn't mean much when the money
isn't there, and the book value in souls of the Church of England is
like a sub-prime loan, overstated, overvalued and under-performing. As
the banks have a steep write down on loans, an honest church would
acknowledge a steep write down on membership. This of course applies to
other parts of the Anglican Communion as well, for example, the American
Episcopal Church.
While we are speaking of banks missing money and churches missing
people, it is interesting to note that the Lambeth Conference organizers
are missing some of both. With a track record of overstating membership,
the CofE Lambeth organizers appear to also be overstating the attendance
at the Lambeth Conference. Various onsite estimates question the 670
number given by officials, and suggestions of 550 up to 600 are being
mentioned by some media sources.
Missing bishops isn't the only thing bothering the Lambeth Conference
and Dr. Rowan Williams - there is the lack of money in pounds sterling.
In planning a event as large as this, care has to be taken or the event
can get away from you and put you in serious debt. Whoever was in charge
of this department was apparently busy elsewhere, for Lambeth is between
1 million and 2 million pounds (approximately 2-4 million USD) short.
Now, as soon as the Conference closes up shop and everyone departs, the
vendors will want to be paid. It is a bit awkward to be short, not just
a quid or two, but 2 million. If the bailiff shows up at Lambeth Palace,
will the guard open the gate? If he does, will there be a garage sale to
raise the funds? If so, there are several pieces in the large waiting
rooms that caught my eye, and I might like to bid on them.
Who has that kind of money to bail Dr. Williams out? Who has that much
money who would wish to bail Dr. Williams out? TEC? They are still a bit
testy over Bishop Gene Robinson's exclusion, and who could forget his
exclusion, given his daily pandering to those outside the fence of
steel, wanting everyone to see him and know how pained he is at being
rejected. Robinson is quoted as saying he is infuriated at being kept
out. No, I don't think that TEC is likely to drop a million dollars or
more, and if they did, and if Rowan accepted it, he would truly look
like a bought man. He won't want to do that; that might be worse than
the bailiff coming by. Though, and this is worth thinking about, if TEC
did give Lambeth Conference two to four million dollars, it would be
that much less money Katharine Jefferts Schori could use to sue devout
Christian Anglicans in the United States. So...Katharine, go for it -
give him the money, pretend Lambeth is a MDG, and let Dr. Williams worry
about his credibility.
Speaking of Bishop Robinson, one has to admire and salute the Sudanese
bishops and primate who made such a clear, concise, loving and bold call
to Robinson, TEC and the Communion. Their call to Robinson to resign and
for all of the TECies to go home and repent was earth-shaking. Bravo!
Dr. Williams has himself called the Lambeth Conference's legitimacy into
question, but blamed those who are staying away. One of the three
English bishops refusing to come to Lambeth, Peter Broadbent, has
invited Williams to put that point to him in person. If Lambeth is
itself called into question does that not by inference affect its
convener as well? One of the principal rights that the Archbishop of
Canterbury has is as a convener of the Church and Communion, and both
GAFCON and the large absence of bishops at Lambeth have seriously called
into question whether Dr. Williams is still THE convener any longer. He
didn't convene GAFCON and it was a huge success, and Lambeth, which he
did convene, has come up short of both bishops and money, and seems to
be breaking down into contention. Dr. Williams, taking yet another shot
at GAFCON, has said, "I think people will have to make the judgment as
to whether those provinces who are not here have a coherent alternative
to what the Communion as gathered here is saying and wanting to do."
Actually, I think people will certainly be making a judgment as to
whether the life, vitality and can-do attitude of GAFCON doesn't look a
whole lot more inviting and exciting than muddling on with more
committees and commissions which meet and talk and write reports.
Ending this week's update on a very positive note, the Common Cause
Partnership (CCP) leaders issued a statement today welcoming the
Jerusalem Declaration and the statement on the Global Anglican Future,
pledging to move forward with the work of Anglican unity in North
America.
Drawing from the GAFCON statement where it says that it is now time for
the federation currently known as the Common Cause Partnership to be
recognized by the Primates Council, the CCP gave notice that they will
respond to this invitation. "The intention of the Executive Committee is
to petition the Primates' Council for recognition of the CCP as the
North American Province of GAFCON on the basis of the Common Cause
Partnership Articles, Theological Statement, and Covenant Declaration,
and to ask that the CCP Moderator be seated in the Primates' Council."
I can only wonder what this next week will bring. To God be the Glory.
Blessings and Peace in Jesus Christ,
The Rt. Rev. David C. Anderson, Sr.
President and CEO, American Anglican Council
_________________________
Anglican communion a 'train wreck', says bishop
Source:
The Telegraph
By Jonathan Wynne-Jones
July 20, 2008
The Anglican Communion is like a "slow moving train wreck", according to
a senior Church of England bishop who has given an extraordinary insight
into the crisis that is engulfing the Church.
The Rt Rev Tom Wright, the Bishop of Durham, has revealed that there is
deep unease over the future of the communion and an atmosphere of mutual
suspicion among bishops.
His comments come as about 650 bishops meet at the once-a-decade Lambeth
conference in Canterbury, with continuing division over the issue of
homosexuality.
Bishop Wright, a senior figure in the Church hierarchy, expressed
concern that the summit was lacking direction and admitted that the
Anglican Church was in a mess. "All sorts of forces have built up over
the years in the communion through misunderstanding and people doing
things differently without really consulting," he said.
"Sooner or later this was all going to meet and hit the buffers. It's
been like a slow-moving train wreck."
The bishop, who is highly respected and a close friend of the Archbishop
of Canterbury, told The Sunday Telegraph that the presence of American
bishops involved in the consecration of Gene Robinson, the first openly
homosexual Anglican bishop, was proving divisive.
"A lot of people here have a lot of questions about why the American
bishops are here," he said. "Those questions are in the room."
Around 250 bishops, mainly from Africa, have boycotted the conference in
protest at Dr Rowan Williams's decision to invite the American bishops,
whom they hold responsible for causing the schism. Organisers have drawn
up an agenda lacking any major votes or debates in the hope that it will
limit conflict.
But Bishop Wright said that there was mistrust between the different
factions over who was going to make the next significant move. "It's
like a very odd game of cards," he said. "We're all being very civil and
talking politely, but people are wondering who is going to play which
card next and hence what responses may be possible."
Bishop Wright added that the summit was lacking direction and questioned
how effective it would be. ...
The rest of the article may be found at the link above.
_________________________
US Bishops drop bid to have Robinson admitted to Lambeth
Conference
Source:
Religious Intelligence
By George Conger
July 22, 2008
Canterbury: The push to seat Gene Robinson at Lambeth Conference failed
yesterday after the American bishops declined to force the issue. At
their July 21 provincial meeting at the Lambeth Conference the American
bishops declined to take action on a request by liberal members of their
caucus to ask the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, to seat
the New Hampshire bishop.
Bishops attending the closed meeting tell ReligiousIntelligence.com that
some bishops pushed for Bishop Robinson to be extended an invitation.
There followed a substantive discussion of the Robinson issue with
several bishops expressing their anger and hurt over his exclusion.
However, the American leadership declined to take up the issue and a
growing number of bishops appear to be distancing themselves from the
controversial New Hampshire cleric in a bid to avoid conflict with the
conference organizers. ...
Speaking to the media on July 21, Dr Williams defended his ban of Gene
Robinson from the Lambeth Conference saying the New Hampshire bishop's
presence would have been "questionable." However, the American, Canadian
and Central American bishops who consecrated Bishop Robinson were
permitted to attend conference because it would have been difficult to
exclude them. ...
Asked why the consecrators of Bishop Robinson were present even though
the Windsor Report recommended their withdrawal from the international
councils of the church, Dr Williams replied, that the "difficulty that I
faced and some others faced was of those who consecrated Gene Robinson
some or a number later expressed a wish that they hadn't, some are
retired and of course a great many American bishops have come into
office since then."
The "American House of Bishops corporately asked for forgiveness for
offense caused last year. Now you'll remember that I circulated to all
the provinces last year with a request as to whether people thought this
was a satisfactory response to the concerns expressed and you'll be
aware that the Joint Standing Committee and 50 percent plus or more of
the provinces said well that's probably all right."
This response was the "basis for saying I don't think I want to go down
the list of consecrators and say yes no or possibly and the House of
Bishops said something corporately which not everyone thought was
adequate, but many did and that was the basis on which I worked with
that one," Dr Williams said.
At a Monday press briefing, the Bishop of Indianapolis declined to
elaborate on the American meeting, saying the discussions were "not
intended to be shared". ...
One bishop told us that the provincial meeting was very much like recent
meetings of the House of Bishops, with the issue of Gene Robinson, and
disquiet with the proposed Anglican Covenant generating a great deal of
passion from some speakers.
However, he added that the majority of American bishops appeared to be
tiring of the focus on the travails of the Bishop of New Hampshire, and
were not yet prepared to buck the Archbishop of Canterbury on this
topic.
The rest of the article may be found at the link above.
_________________________
Lambeth rocked as Primate of Sudan calls on Robinson to resign
Source:
Religious Intelligence
July 22, 2008
By George Conger
The Bishop of New Hampshire must resign in order to save the Anglican
Communion from chaos, the Archbishop of Juba and Primate of the Sudan,
said today. "If [Gene Robinson] were a real Christian he would resign,"
Archbishop Daniel Deng said on July 22.
In a statement released on the second day of the Lambeth Conference, the
Sudanese church called upon the American church to "respect the
authority of the Bible," refrain from ordaining gay priests or bishops,
halt gay blessings, and "cease court actions" against traditionalists
"with immediate effect." The American Church's experiments with gay
blessings and bishops had led to the deaths of Sudanese Christians, Dr
Daniel Deng said in an impromptu press conference in the Lambeth
Conference media room.
Because of the actions of the American church, "we are called infidels
in the Islamic world when they hear of the same-sex blessings," he said.
"It will give [Islamist militants] reason to kill" Sudanese Christians
he said. Dr Deng's statement, backed by over 150 bishops from 17 Global
South provinces presents a significant blow to Dr. Rowan Williams' hopes
of averting a crisis at the 14th Lambeth Conference. The American church
has been on its best behavior at Lambeth, seeking to mollify criticism
from the wider Communion and preserve its place in the Church.
However, the Sudanese Archbishop, Dr Daniel Deng said there was "already
a breakdown of the Anglican Communion." To prevent its wholesale
collapse, "Gene Robinson should resign."
The Sudanese statement comes amidst a turbulent second day of the
Lambeth Conference. Sources within the conference organizing committee
report Lambeth is over £1 million in debt, while the conference press
office has refused to release the names of the bishops present,
alternately citing concerns over privacy and security. ...
The Bishop of Durham and other English bishops met with the primates to
formalize a way forward for the conservative amidst the chaos of the
Anglican Communion the unfolding train wreck of the Lambeth Conference.
The two conservative factions are at odds with the best way of
responding to the crisis of doctrine and discipline within the Anglican
Communion. The Gafcon wing, led by the Churches of Nigeria and Uganda
and comprise over 60 percent of the Communion's members, are seeking to
reform the Anglican Communion, lessening the authority of the Archbishop
of Canterbury and the existing power structures.
The Communion Partners group seeks to work within the existing power
structures of the Communion, to preserve the Evangelical and
Anglo-Catholic voice in North America.
However, events within the Conference are moving faster than can be
controlled by Dr Williams and the conference organizers. The indaba
process of small group meetings of 40 bishops has received mixed
reviews. The Bishop of Pittsburgh Robert Duncan said the sessions
reminded him of the US House of Bishops' meetings, with the structure
designed to produce predetermined ends. ...
The rest of the article may be found at the link above.
_________________________
Bishop Iker calls for Robinson backers to withdraw from Lambeth
Source: TimesOnline
By Ruth Gledhill
July 22, 2008
...The Right Rev Jack Iker, Bishop of Forth Worth, said: "Those Bishops
who stand in solidarity with Gene Robinson should withdraw themselves
from further participation in the Lambeth Conference. Having failed in
several attempts to include Gene in the Conference, his supporters
should themselves feel a sense of rejection from the Conference itself.
"Integrity and honesty would dictate that they should stand with Gene —
excluded from full participation in the Lambeth Conference. Is this all
talk, or is it backed up by action?" ...
The rest of the article may be found at the link above.
_________________________
Common Cause Partnership Welcomes Jerusalem Declaration
Source: Common Cause Partnership
website
July 24, 2008
The Common Cause Partnership leaders issued a statement today welcoming
the Jerusalem Declaration and the statement on the Global Anglican
Future and pledging to move forward with the work of Anglican unity in
North America . We, as the Bishops and elected leaders of the Common
Cause Partnership (CCP) are deeply grateful for the Jerusalem
Declaration. It describes a hopeful, global Anglican future, rooted in
scripture and the authentic Anglican way of faith and practice. We
joyfully welcome the words of the GAFCON statement that it is now time
'for the federation currently known as the Common Cause Partnership to
be recognized by the Primates Council.'
The intention of the CCP Executive Committee is to petition the Primates
Council for recognition of the CCP as the North American Province of
GAFCON on the basis of the Common Cause Partnership Articles,
Theological Statement, and Covenant Declaration, and to ask that the CCP
Moderator be seated in the Primate's Council.
We accept the call to build the Common Cause Partnership into a truly
unified body of Anglicans. We are committed to that call. Over the past
months, we have worked together, increasing the number of partners and
authorizing committees and task groups for Mission, Education,
Governance, Prayer Book & Liturgy, the Episcopate, and Ecumenical
Relations. The Executive Committee is meeting regularly to carry forward
the particulars of this call. The CCP Council will meet December 1–3,
2008.
The Common Cause Partnership links together nine Anglican jurisdictions
and organizations in North America . Together, the American Anglican
Council, the Anglican Coalition in Canada, the Anglican Communion
Network, the Anglican Mission in the Americas, the Anglican Network in
Canada, the Convocation of Anglicans in North America, the Federation of
Anglican Churches in the Americas, Forward in Faith North America and
the Reformed Episcopal Church represent more the 1,300 Anglican parishes
in the United States and Canada. The Common Cause Partnership Executive
Committee is: The Rt. Rev'd Robert Duncan, Moderator; The Venerable
Charlie Masters, General Secretary; Mrs. Patience Oruh, Treasurer; The
Rt. Rev'd Keith Ackerman, Forward in Faith North America; The Rt. Rev'd
David Anderson, American Anglican Council; The Rt. Rev'd Donald Harvey,
Anglican Network in Canada; The Rt. Rev'd Paul Hewett, Federation of
Anglican Churches in the Americas; The Rt. Rev'd Martyn Minns,
Convocation of Anglicans in North America; The Rt. Rev'd Chuck Murphy,
Anglican Mission in the Americas; The Rt. Rev'd Leonard Riches, Reformed
Episcopal Church; The Rt. Rev'd Bill Atwood, Anglican Church of Kenya
and The Rt. Rev'd John Guernsey, Church of the Province of Uganda.
________________________
Response of the GAFCON Theological Resource Team to the St
Andrews Draft Text of An Anglican Covenant
Source: GAFCON
website
July 22, 2008
Introduction
The idea of a Covenant as a way out of the difficulties in which the
Anglican Communion finds itself has been proposed in several quarters.
The St Andrews Draft Text of An Anglican Covenant is one such attempt.
The GAFCON Theological Resource Team reviewed the St Andrews Draft Text
during pre-conference preparations in Jerusalem on 20th and 21st June
2008.
An Anglican Covenant was intended as a response to a crisis in the
Anglican Communion which has been accurately described as 'a rending of
the Communion at the deepest level'. Determined departures from the
teaching of Scripture on human sexuality by The Episcopal Church and the
Anglican Church of Canada are the immediate cause this situation. There
appears no prospect of repentance from this repudiation of biblical
authority on the part of either of these bodies (or from those elsewhere
who have followed their lead in endorsing behaviour which Scripture
explicitly forbids). Underlying these actions is a long history of
marginalising, avoiding and at last rejecting the plain teaching of the
Bible. In other words, the issue which we should expect this covenant to
address is one of apostasy. ...
Sadly this new draft of An Anglican Covenant is both seriously limited
and severely flawed. Whether or not the tool of covenant is the right
way to approach the crisis within the Communion, this document is
defective and its defects cannot be corrected by piecemeal amendment
because they are fundamental. The St. Andrews Draft is theologically
incoherent and its proposals unworkable. It has no prospect of success
since it fails to address the problems which have created the crisis and
the new realities which have ensued.
This document falls in effect into two parts. Sections 1 and 2 mention
some matters of faith, but section 3 is in fact the critical section of
the document, because this introduces the thought of Churches as being
'autonomous-in-communion'. It is on this concept that the proposed
resolution of Communion disputes rests.
Our response will confine itself to seven areas of theological concern
and will briefly mention two other significant issues in its conclusion.
...
The rest of the article may be found at the link above.
|
|
|